Every engagement is led by a senior partner — not delegated to junior staff. You work directly with the people who have done this work across hundreds of facilities.
Shiftwork Solutions LLC is a fixed-fee management consulting firm specializing in shift schedule design, change management, and workforce engagement for 24/7 industrial operations. We have been doing this work for over 30 years — across hundreds of facilities, more than 16 industries, and operations ranging from 40 employees to more than 4,000.
The firm operates as a three-partner practice. Every engagement is led by a partner from kickoff through implementation. We do not use junior staff, subcontractors, or proprietary software. What we bring is judgment — about schedules, about people, and about what it takes to make lasting change in a complex operation.
Jim founded the firm on a philosophy that schedule change done well is one of the highest-leverage management decisions an operations leader can make — and that getting it right requires earning the workforce's trust before asking for their buy-in.
A former Naval officer, Jim brings the discipline of structured planning to every engagement, alongside a genuine belief that employees who participate in designing their schedule become its strongest advocates. He leads change management strategy for complex, multi-department, and union environments.
Over more than three decades, Jim has guided schedule transitions at operations ranging from greenfield startups to mature facilities making their first major schedule change in 20 years.
Dan combines the analytical discipline of a chemical engineer with the process improvement rigor of a Lean Six Sigma Black Belt. He leads schedule design and cost modeling for technically complex operations — chemical plants, pharmaceutical facilities, continuous process manufacturing — where coverage requirements, safety constraints, and labor economics intersect in ways that generic scheduling approaches cannot address.
Dan's background includes work in submarine engineering, which gave him an early grounding in the human factors consequences of poor schedule design. That experience shapes how he approaches every cost analysis and crew structure decision.
Ethan brings a distinctive combination of engineering analysis, legal training, and workforce survey expertise to the practice. He designed and refined the firm's proprietary Work-Life Balance Survey — the diagnostic tool that underpins every workforce engagement — and oversees the normative benchmarking database that allows clients to compare their results against similar operations across industries.
His legal background gives him a practitioner's understanding of the labor and employment dimensions of schedule change — particularly in unionized environments, where the sequencing of decisions and documentation can determine whether a well-designed change succeeds or gets reversed.
Every engagement begins the same way: we try to understand the operation before we propose anything. That means reviewing existing schedules, talking to supervisors, and understanding the cost drivers before a single recommendation is made.
We do not arrive with a preferred schedule or a standard template. The right answer for a chemical plant running three-crew continental rotations is different from the right answer for a distribution center expanding from 5-day to 7-day operations.
The schedule is not the end product. The end product is a workforce that chose it, understood it, and is committed to making it work.
Our engagements are fixed-fee. We scope work before we price it, and the fee we agree to at the start is the fee you pay — regardless of what we find or how complex the situation turns out to be. We do not create dependency or extend engagements beyond what the problem requires.
We are available to clients for the lifetime of a relationship — not just for the duration of a project. Many clients have come back to us as their operations have grown, as labor markets have shifted, or as the schedule they implemented years ago has needed a refresh. We consider that the most meaningful measure of whether the work was done right.